<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for House Fireheart &gt;  House Fireheart</title>
	<atom:link href="http://housefireheart.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://housefireheart.org</link>
	<description>Grasping the Numinous</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 03:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hmm, layout problem - I&#8217;ll post instead of commenting by Sam</title>
		<link>http://housefireheart.org/2006/09/28/hmm-layout-problem-ill-post-instead-of-commenting/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://housefireheart.org/2006/09/28/hmm-layout-problem-ill-post-instead-of-commenting/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>On the other hand, though, if someone is interested in being with one of us and can't be arsed to read a document about it, then do we really want to be involved with them?

It's daunting, yes, and some of the language is blunt, but you know, I think it does weed out people who aren't exactly motivated to follow a similar process.

Something I was thinking of - let's go ahead and write what we know to be incomplete drafts...knowing that the drafts we create are not going to take the full 360 degree perspective, and use those as basis to work from. That way, we don't have to worry about some kind of "rightness or wrongness" or to "have to get it perfect the first time out"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the other hand, though, if someone is interested in being with one of us and can&#8217;t be arsed to read a document about it, then do we really want to be involved with them?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s daunting, yes, and some of the language is blunt, but you know, I think it does weed out people who aren&#8217;t exactly motivated to follow a similar process.</p>
<p>Something I was thinking of - let&#8217;s go ahead and write what we know to be incomplete drafts&#8230;knowing that the drafts we create are not going to take the full 360 degree perspective, and use those as basis to work from. That way, we don&#8217;t have to worry about some kind of &#8220;rightness or wrongness&#8221; or to &#8220;have to get it perfect the first time out&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
